Does Micro-CT scanning damage DNA in museum specimens?
| dc.contributor.author | Hall, A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sherlock, E | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sykes, D | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-10T10:06:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-06-10T10:06:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-04-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Does Micro-CT scanning damage DNA in museum specimens? Hall, A., Sherlock, E., Sykes, D. Journal of Natural Science Collections, Volume 2, pages 22 - 29 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10141/612488 | |
| dc.description.abstract | X-ray micro-computed tomography and DNA sequencing are useful and increasingly common tools in taxonomy and collections research. Whilst the benefits of each method are continually evaluated and debated individually, how the methods impact each other requires more attention. We compared DNA fragment length and the barcode sequence CO1 in samples throughout a CT-scanning protocol, for a range of X-ray exposures and energies. We found no evidence of DNA damage, but advise caution when using precious or archival material, highlighting the need for further investigations and considering potential areas for research. | |
| dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Natural Science Collections Association | en_US |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.natsca.org/article/2075 | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.natsca.org/sites/default/files/publications/JoNSC%20Vol2-3.PDF | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.title | Does Micro-CT scanning damage DNA in museum specimens? | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Natural Science Collections | en_US |
| dc.conference.location | UK | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 2 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 22 - 28 | en_US |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum/Science Group | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum/Science Group/Core Research Laboratories | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum/Science Group/Core Research Laboratories/Imaging and Analysis Centre (IAC) | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum/Science Group/Core Research Laboratories/Molecular Biology Laboratories | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum/Science Group/Functional groups | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum/Science Group/Functional groups/Facilities Support | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum/Science Group/Functional groups/Other Support | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Natural History Museum/Science Group/Life Sciences | |
| dc.embargo | Not known | en_US |
| elements.import.author | Hall, A | en_US |
| elements.import.author | Sherlock, E | en_US |
| elements.import.author | Sykes, D | en_US |
| dc.description.nhm | NatSCA supports open access publication as part of its mission is to promote and support natural science collections. NatSCA uses the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ for all works we publish. Under CCAL authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles in NatSCA publications, so long as the original authors and source are cited. The attached file is the published version of the article. | |
| dc.description.nhm | NHM Repository | |
| dc.subject.nhm | Micro-computed tomography; X-ray microtomography; DNA fragmentation; PCR; Sanger sequencing; Barcoding; Lumbricus terrestris; Oligochaeta | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2019-03-01T08:37:09Z | |
| html.description.abstract | X-ray micro-computed tomography and DNA sequencing are useful and increasingly common tools in taxonomy and collections research. Whilst the benefits of each method are continually evaluated and debated individually, how the methods impact each other requires more attention. We compared DNA fragment length and the barcode sequence CO1 in samples throughout a CT-scanning protocol, for a range of X-ray exposures and energies. We found no evidence of DNA damage, but advise caution when using precious or archival material, highlighting the need for further investigations and considering potential areas for research. |


