Shedding light on the ‘dark side’ of phylogenetic comparative methods
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to
this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Editors
O'Hara, RBIssue date
2016-06Submitted date
2016-07-01Subject Terms
assumption; bias; caveat; Ornstein–Uhlenbeck; PCM; phylogenetic independent contrasts; trait-dependent diversification
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cooper, N., Thomas, G. H., FitzJohn, R. G. (2016), Shedding light on the ‘dark side’ of phylogenetic comparative methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7: 693–699. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12533Journal
Methods in Ecology and EvolutionType
Journal ArticleItem Description
© 2016 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The attached file is the published version of the article.NHM Repository
ISSN
2041-210Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/2041-210X.12533
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is
described as
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/