• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Science
    • Life sciences
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Science
    • Life sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of The Natural History Museum repositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue dateAvailable dateSubjectsTypesJournalPublisherThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue dateAvailable dateSubjectsTypesJournalPublisher

    My Account

    Login

    About

    AboutOur scienceDepartments and staffCollectionsLibrary and ArchivesContact usCreative Commons Attribution 2.0 LicenseGetting Started

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Contrasting Biogeographic and Diversification Patterns in Two Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Contrasting biogeographic and ...
    Size:
    1.372Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Published/publisher’s pdf
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Buerki, S
    Jose, S
    Yadav, SR
    Goldblatt, P
    Manning, JC
    Forest, F
    Editors
    Salamin, N
    Issue date
    2012-06-20
    Submitted date
    2017-02-23
    Subject Terms
    Mediterranean Basin
    Cape Floristic Region
    Hyacinthaceae
    Biogeography
    Diversification
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The five Mediterranean regions of the world comprise almost 50,000 plant species (ca 20% of the known vascular plants) despite accounting for less than 5% of the world’s land surface. The ecology and evolutionary history of two of these regions, the Cape Floristic Region and the Mediterranean Basin, have been extensively investigated, but there have been few studies aimed at understanding the historical relationships between them. Here, we examine the biogeographic and diversification processes that shaped the evolution of plant diversity in the Cape and the Mediterranean Basin using a large plastid data set for the geophyte family Hyacinthaceae (comprising ca. 25% of the total diversity of the group), a group found mainly throughout Africa and Eurasia. Hyacinthaceae is a predominant group in the Cape and the Mediterranean Basin both in terms of number of species and their morphological and ecological variability. Using state-of-the-art methods in biogeography and diversification, we found that the Old World members of the family originated in sub-Saharan Africa at the Paleocene–Eocene boundary and that the two Mediterranean regions both have high diversification rates, but contrasting biogeographic histories. While the Cape diversity has been greatly influenced by its relationship with sub-Saharan Africa throughout the history of the family, the Mediterranean Basin had no connection with the latter after the onset of the Mediterranean climate in the region and the aridification of the Sahara. The Mediterranean Basin subsequently contributed significantly to the diversity of neighbouring areas, especially Northern Europe and the Middle East, whereas the Cape can be seen as a biogeographical cul-de-sac, with only a few dispersals toward sub-Saharan Africa. The understanding of the evolutionary history of these two important repositories of biodiversity would benefit from the application of the framework developed here to other groups of plants present in the two regions.
    Citation
    Buerki S, Jose S, Yadav SR, Goldblatt P, Manning JC, et al. (2012) Contrasting Biogeographic and Diversification Patterns in Two Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems. PLoS ONE 7(6): e39377. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039377
    Publisher
    PLOS
    Journal
    PLoS ONE
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10141/622498
    DOI
    10.1371/journal.pone.0039377
    Type
    Journal Article
    Item Description
    Copyright 2012 Buerki et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The attached file is the published version of the article.
    NHM Repository
    EISSN
    1932-6203
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1371/journal.pone.0039377
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Life sciences

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export button (to the right?) will allow you to export the search results of the entered query to a CSV file. To export the items, click the "Export" button.

    There are two options to select the items you want to export to a CSV. Either you export all results from a search query, or you select a subset of items from the search results.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" in the Export menu.

    After making a selection, click the 'CSV' button. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to 'CSV'.

    The amount of items you can export is limited, but authenticating will increase this limit.