Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTruscott, James
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Julia
dc.contributor.authorPAPAIAKOVOU, MARINA
dc.contributor.authorSchaer, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorWerkman, Marleen
dc.contributor.authorLittlewood, T
dc.contributor.authorWalson, JL
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Roy
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-25T16:10:49Z
dc.date.available2020-03-25T16:10:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-21
dc.date.submitted2019-03-30
dc.identifier.citationTruscott JE, Dunn JC, Papaiakovou M, Schaer F, Werkman M, Littlewood DTJ, et al. (2019) Calculating the prevalence of soiltransmitted helminth infection through pooling of stool samples: Choosing and optimizing the pooling strategy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13(3): e0007196en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pntd.0007196
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10141/622655
dc.description.abstractPrevalence is a common epidemiological measure for assessing soil-transmitted helminth burden and forms the basis for much public-health decision-making. Standard diagnostic techniques are based on egg detection in stool samples through microscopy and these techniques are known to have poor sensitivity for individuals with low infection intensity, leading to poor sensitivity in low prevalence populations. PCR diagnostic techniques offer very high sensitivities even at low prevalence, but at a greater cost for each diagnostic test in terms of equipment needed and technician time and training. Pooling of samples can allow prevalence to be estimated while minimizing the number of tests performed. We develop a model of the relative cost of pooling to estimate prevalence, compared to the direct approach of testing all samples individually. Analysis shows how expected elative cost depends on both the underlying prevalence in the population and the size of the pools constructed. A critical prevalence level (approx. 31%) above which pooling is never cost effective, independent of pool size. When no prevalence information is available, there is no basis on which to choose between pooling and testing all samples individually. We recast our model of relative cost in a Bayesian framework in order to investigate how prior information about prevalence in a given population can be used to inform the decision to choose either pooling or full testing. Results suggest that if prevalence is below 10%, a relatively small exploratory prevalence survey (10–15 samples) can be sufficient to give a high degree of certainty that pooling may be relatively cost effective.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445468/en_US
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleCalculating the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infection through pooling of stool samples: Choosing and optimizing the pooling strategyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1935-2735
dc.identifier.journalPLOS Neglected Tropical Diseasesen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Access control
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Access control/Management LS
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Functional groups
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Functional groups/Research
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Initiatives
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Initiatives/Natural Resources and Hazards
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Life Sciences
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Life Sciences/Parasites and Vectors
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Life Sciences/Parasites and Vectors/Parasites and Vectors - Research
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Science Directorate
pubs.organisational-group/Natural History Museum/Science Group/Science Directorate/Science Directorate
dc.embargoNot knownen_US
elements.import.authorTruscott, JEen_US
elements.import.authorDunn, JCen_US
elements.import.authorPapaiakovou, Men_US
elements.import.authorSchaer, Fen_US
elements.import.authorWerkman, Men_US
elements.import.authorLittlewood, DTJen_US
elements.import.authorWalson, JLen_US
elements.import.authorAnderson, RMen_US
dc.description.nhm© 2019 Truscott et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.subject.nhmDNA extractionen_US
dc.subject.nhmCost-effectiveness analysisen_US
dc.subject.nhmSoil-transmitted helminthiasesen_US
dc.subject.nhmPolymerase chain reactionen_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-25T16:10:50Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
pntd.0007196.pdf
Size:
1.053Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Published/publisher’s pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as openAccess