Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to
this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue date
2020-09-30Submitted date
2020-09-17Subject Terms
black-and-white printingcolour blind
deuteranomaly
illustration
publishing
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
People who are colour-blind or have some form of colour vision deficiency form an invisible minority and scientists should strive to be as inclusive as possible. We reviewed 2873 figures published in 2019 from 1031 scientific papers in 27 ornithological journals to determine those that were colour-blind compatible, and those that were black-and-white printer friendly. About 26% of the published figures were in colour, and while most were colour-blind compatible, only ~ 60% of them were black-and-white printer friendly. Ensuring figures in all forms of scientific communication can be interpreted by readers who are colour-blind, and can be printed in black-and-white will improve the accessibility of ornithological research.Citation
Pollet, I.L. and Bond, A.L. (2021), Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163: 292-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887Publisher
WileyJournal
IbisType
Journal ArticleItem Description
This is an open access article, available to all readers online, published under a creative commons licensing (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The attached file is the published version of the article.NHM Repository
ISSN
0019-1019EISSN
1474-919Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/ibi.12887
Scopus Count
Collections