What’s the catch with lumpsuckers? A North Atlantic study of seabird bycatch in lumpsucker gillnet fisheries
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to
this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Christensen-Dalsgaard, SigneAnker-Nilssen, Tycho
Crawford, Rory
Bond, AL
Sigurðsson, Guðjón Már
Glemarec, Gildas
Hansen, Erpur Snær
Kadin, Martina
Kindt-Larsen, Lotte
Mallory, Mark
Merkel, Flemming Ravn
Petersen, Aevar
Provencher, Jennifer
Bærum, Kim Magnus
Issue date
2019-12Submitted date
2019-04-12Subject Terms
bycatchCyclopterus lumpus
fisheries
gillnets
North Atlantic
seabirds
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Worldwide, incidental bycatch in fisheries is a conservation threat to many seabird species. Although knowledge on bycatch of seabirds has increased in the last decade, most stems from longline fisheries and the impacts of coastal gillnet fisheries are poorly understood. Gillnet fishing for North Atlantic lumpsucker (Cyclopterus lumpus) is one such fishery. We collated and synthesized the available information on seabird bycatch in lumpsucker gillnet fisheries across the entire geographical range to estimate and infer the magnitude of their impact on the affected seabird populations. Most birds killed were diving ducks, cormorants and auks, and each year locally high numbers of seabirds were taken as bycatch. We found large differences in bycatch rates among countries. The estimated mean bycatch in Iceland was 2.43 birds/trip, while the estimates in Norway was 0.44 and 0.39 birds/trip, respectively. The large disparities between estimates might reflect large spatial differences in bycatch rates, but could partly also arise due to distinctions in data recorded by onboard inspectors (Iceland), selfadministered registration (Norway) and direct observations by cameras (Denmark). We show that lumpsucker gillnet fisheries might pose a significant risk to some populations of diving seabirds. However, a distinct data deficiency on seabird bycatch in terms of spatio-temporal coverage and the age and origins of the birds killed, limited our abilities to fully assess the extent and population consequences of the bycatch. Our results highlight the need for a joint effort among countries to standardize monitoring methods to better document the impact of these fisheries on seabirds.Citation
Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard, Tycho Anker-Nilssen, Rory Crawford, Alexander Bond, Guðjón Már Sigurðsson, Gildas Glemarec, Erpur Snær Hansen, Martina Kadin, Lotte Kindt-Larsen, Mark Mallory, Flemming Ravn Merkel, Aevar Petersen, Jennifer Provencher, Kim Magnus Bærum, What’s the catch with lumpsuckers? A North Atlantic study of seabird bycatch in lumpsucker gillnet fisheries, Biological Conservation, Volume 240, 2019, 108278, ISSN 0006-3207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108278.Publisher
Elsevier BVJournal
Biological ConservationType
Journal ArticleItem Description
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)NHM Repository
ISSN
0006-3207EISSN
1873-2917ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108278
Scopus Count
Collections