The Big Seaweed Search: Evaluating a citizen science project for a difficult to identify group of organisms
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to
this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue date
2023-01-04Submitted date
2022-06-24Subject Terms
citizen scienceconservation
coralline algae
data verification
large brown seaweeds
non-native species
ocean acidification
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
1. The Big Seaweed Search invites people to survey UK seashores for 14 conspicuous seaweeds. The science investigates: (i) impact of sea temperature rise; (ii) spread of non-native species; and (iii) impact of ocean acidification. Survey data submitted between June 2016 and May 2020 were analysed to evaluate and explore project directions in relation to citizen science project development. 2. Of the 378 surveys submitted, 1,414 people participated, contributing 1,531 person hours. Surveys were undertaken around the UK, with the highest proportion (46.7%) in the south west and the lowest (3.7%) in the north east. After data verification, 1,007 (54%) records were accepted. Fucus serratus had the highest number of entries correctly identified (66%) and Undaria pinnatifida the lowest (5%), inferring that at least some seaweeds can be difficult to identify, although the overall misidentification rate was relatively low (c. 15%). 3. Apart from Alaria esculenta, U. pinnatifida and Saccharina latissima, the large brown seaweeds were abundant on at least some shores. Non-natives Sargassum muticum and Asparagopsis armata, were band-forming but in low numbers. Coralline algae, whilst band-forming on some shores, were most commonly patchy or sparse in abundance. Revisits, i.e. repeat surveys, at the same site with an interval of at least 1 year, are relatively low, with 18 sites revisited once and three sites revisited twice. 4. Currently, data are insufficient to determine whether any changes in abundance could be detected. 5. This study highlights areas where project developments can enhance data quality and quantity, e.g. better identification resources, training programmes for dedicated volunteers, and an annual focus week of activities. The project framed around climate change impacts, aims to raise awareness of the ecological importance of, and threats faced by, this understudied habitat and introduce conservation concepts including the need to protect common species showing signs of decline.Citation
Brodie, J., Kunzig, S., Agate, J., Yesson, C. & Robinson, L. (2022). The Big Seaweed Search: Evaluating a citizen science project for a difficult to identify group of organisms. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc. 3903Publisher
WileyDOI
10.1002/aqc.3903Type
Journal ArticleItem Description
Copyright © 2022, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This document is the author’s accepted version of the journal article. You are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.NHM Repository
ISSN
1052-7613EISSN
1099-0755ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/aqc.3903
Scopus Count
Collections