The taxonomic composition and chronology of a museum collection of Coleoptera revealed through large-scale digitisation
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to
this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
garner, beulahCreedy, Thomas J
Allan, Elizabeth L
Crowther, Robyn
Devenish, Elizabeth
Kokkini, Phaedra
Livermore, Laurence
Lohonya, Krisztina
Lowndes, Nicola
Wing, Peter
Vogler, Alfried P
Issue date
2024-07-17Submitted date
2023-10-02Subject Terms
natural history collectionsdigitisation
biodiversity informatics
entomology
taxonomy
biogeography
Carabidae
curation
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Introduction: Historic museum collections hold a wealth of biodiversity data that are essential to our understanding of the rapidly changing natural world. Novel curatorial practices are needed to extract and digitise these data, especially for the innumerable pinned insects whose collecting information is held on small labels. Methods: We piloted semi-automated specimen imaging and digitisation of specimen labels for a collection of ~29,000 pinned insects of ground beetles (Carabidae: Lebiinae) held at the Natural History Museum, London. Raw transcription data were curated against literature sources and non-digital collection records. The primary data were subjected to statistical analyses to infer trends in collection activities and descriptive taxonomy over the past two centuries. Results: This work produced research-ready digitised records for 2,546 species (40% of known species of Lebiinae). Label information was available on geography in 91% of identified specimens, and the time of collection in 39.8% of specimens and could be approximated for nearly all specimens. Label data revealed the great age of this collection (average age 91.4 years) and the peak period of specimen acquisition between 1880 and 1930, with little differences among continents. Specimen acquisition declined greatly after about 1950. Early detected species generally were present in numerous specimens but were missing records from recent decades, while more recently acquired species (after 1950) were represented mostly by singleton specimens only. The slowing collection growth was mirrored by the decreasing rate of species description, which was affected by huge time lags of several decades to formal description after the initial specimen acquisition. Discussion: Historic label information provides a unique resource for assessing the state of biodiversity backwards to pre-industrial times. Many species held in historical collections especially from tropical super-diverse areas may not be discovered ever again, and if they do, their recognition requires access to digital resources and more complete levels of species description. A final challenge is to link the historical specimens to contemporary collections that are mostly conducted with mechanical trapping of specimens and DNA-based species recognition.Citation
Garner BH, Creedy TJ, Allan EL, Crowther R, Devenish E, Kokkini P, Livermore L, Lohonya K, Lowndes N, Wing P and Vogler AP (2024) The taxonomic composition and chronology of a museum collection of Coleoptera revealed through large-scale digitisation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 12:1305931. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1305931Publisher
Frontiers Media SAType
Journal ArticleItem Description
COPYRIGHT © 2024 Garner, Creedy, Allan, Crowther, Devenish, Kokkini, Livermore, Lohonya, Lowndes, Wing and Vogler. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. The linked file is the published version of the article.NHM Repository
ISSN
2296-701XEISSN
2296-701Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fevo.2024.1305931
Scopus Count
Collections

