Earthworm Watch: Insights into urban earthworm communities in the UK using citizen science
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to
this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue date
2024-04-20Submitted date
2023-07-14Subject Terms
Citizen scienceCommunity science
Earthworms
Ecological groups
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The distribution of earthworm ecological groups in urban areas is not well-known, despite their crucial role in delivering soil ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling and water drainage. Citizen science engages public audiences in the scientific research process and is an excellent tool for collecting biodiversity data in urban areas, where most of the UK population resides. However, a disadvantage is that differing levels of skill and engagement among participants can create statistical challenges. The Earthworm Watch citizen science project used 668 matched-pair surveys to estimate how the abundance and ecological diversity of earthworms respond to land management practices, and soil properties in UK urban habitats. A total of 5170 earthworms were counted during the project with a mean of 8 earthworms per soil pit - equivalent to a density of 198 earthworms per m2. Soil moisture and texture were the largest drivers of total earthworm abundance, with habitat borderline statistically insignificant. Endogeic earthworms were found in 71 % of soil pits, epigeic in 62 % and anecic in 33 %. Fertiliser use also had a significant effect on total abundance, but only when organic fertiliser was used. Earthworm ecological groups demonstrated varied responses to habitat, with endogeic earthworms consistently the most abundant group, showing slight preferences for grasslands and vegetable beds. Anecic earthworms had the lowest abundance across all habitats but were more prevalent in grasslands and vegetable beds. Epigeic earthworms were most abundant beneath shrubs and hedges. These findings align with expected patterns of earthworm ecology, underscoring the potential of well-designed citizen science projects to yield valuable insights into urban earthworms and soil health.Citation
Victoria J. Burton, Alan G. Jones, Lucy D. Robinson, Paul Eggleton, Andy Purvis, Earthworm Watch: Insights into urban earthworm communities in the UK using citizen science, European Journal of Soil Biology, Volume 121, 2024, 103622, ISSN 1164-5563, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103622.Publisher
Elsevier BVJournal
European Journal of Soil BiologyType
Journal ArticleItem Description
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The linked file is the published version of the article.NHM Repository
ISSN
1164-5563EISSN
1778-3615ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103622
Scopus Count
Collections

