Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurton, VJ
dc.contributor.authorJones, Alan G
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Lucy D
dc.contributor.authorEggleton, P
dc.contributor.authorPurvis, A
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-29T09:59:03Z
dc.date.available2026-01-29T09:59:03Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-20
dc.date.submitted2023-07-14
dc.identifier.citationVictoria J. Burton, Alan G. Jones, Lucy D. Robinson, Paul Eggleton, Andy Purvis, Earthworm Watch: Insights into urban earthworm communities in the UK using citizen science, European Journal of Soil Biology, Volume 121, 2024, 103622, ISSN 1164-5563, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103622.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1164-5563
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103622
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10141/623399
dc.description.abstractThe distribution of earthworm ecological groups in urban areas is not well-known, despite their crucial role in delivering soil ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling and water drainage. Citizen science engages public audiences in the scientific research process and is an excellent tool for collecting biodiversity data in urban areas, where most of the UK population resides. However, a disadvantage is that differing levels of skill and engagement among participants can create statistical challenges. The Earthworm Watch citizen science project used 668 matched-pair surveys to estimate how the abundance and ecological diversity of earthworms respond to land management practices, and soil properties in UK urban habitats. A total of 5170 earthworms were counted during the project with a mean of 8 earthworms per soil pit - equivalent to a density of 198 earthworms per m2. Soil moisture and texture were the largest drivers of total earthworm abundance, with habitat borderline statistically insignificant. Endogeic earthworms were found in 71 % of soil pits, epigeic in 62 % and anecic in 33 %. Fertiliser use also had a significant effect on total abundance, but only when organic fertiliser was used. Earthworm ecological groups demonstrated varied responses to habitat, with endogeic earthworms consistently the most abundant group, showing slight preferences for grasslands and vegetable beds. Anecic earthworms had the lowest abundance across all habitats but were more prevalent in grasslands and vegetable beds. Epigeic earthworms were most abundant beneath shrubs and hedges. These findings align with expected patterns of earthworm ecology, underscoring the potential of well-designed citizen science projects to yield valuable insights into urban earthworms and soil health.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
dc.titleEarthworm Watch: Insights into urban earthworm communities in the UK using citizen scienceen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1778-3615
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Journal of Soil Biologyen_US
dc.date.updated2025-09-09T10:45:59Z
dc.identifier.volume121en_US
dc.identifier.startpage103622-103622en_US
elements.import.authorBurton, Victoria J
elements.import.authorJones, Alan G
elements.import.authorRobinson, Lucy D
elements.import.authorEggleton, Paul
elements.import.authorPurvis, Andy
dc.description.nhmCopyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The linked file is the published version of the article.en_US
dc.description.nhmNHM Repository
dc.subject.nhmCitizen scienceen_US
dc.subject.nhmCommunity scienceen_US
dc.subject.nhmEarthwormsen_US
dc.subject.nhmEcological groupsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as openAccess